Shape of ovoidal digestion tank and selection of agitated equipment.
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Comparison of non-agitated and agitated batch, thermophilic anaerobic digestion of sugarbeet tailings.
Sugar beet tailings were anaerobically digested at non-agitated and agitated conditions in identical thermophilic batch reactors. The average methane yield in the agitated digester was only 74% of that in the non-agitated digester. Ninety percent of the ultimate methane yield was produced in approximately 5 days in the non-agitated digester whereas it took 12 days in agitated digester. Even upo...
متن کاملevidence of adverse selection in irans health insurance market
در این تحقیق به مطالعه وجود انتخاب نامساعد(کژ گزینی) در بازار بیمه درمان تکمیلی ایران پرداخته شده است. داده های مورد نیاز توسط پرسشنامه و به روش نمونه گیری خوشه ای جمع آوری شده است. پرسشنامه ها در میان افراد شاغل ساکن شهر تهران توریع شد. در این تحقیق با استفاده از تخمین دو مدل لجستیک و به دست آوردن ضریب همبستگی میان تقاضای بیمه درمان تکمیلی و رخداد خسارت به بررسی موضوع مورد نظر پرداخته شده است....
15 صفحه اولthe effect of explicit teaching of metacognitive vocabulary learning strategies on recall and retention of idioms
چکیده ندارد.
15 صفحه اولeffect of postharvest application of chitosan and calcium chloride on decay and quality attributes of sweet cherry
چکیده ندارد.
15 صفحه اولMicrobial Ecology in Anaerobic Digestion at Agitated and Non-Agitated Conditions
To investigate the distribution and dynamics of microbial community in anaerobic digestion at agitated and non-agitated condition, 454 pyrosequencing of 16s rRNA was conducted. It revealed the distinct community compositions between the two digesters and their progressive shifting over time. Methanogens and syntrophic bacteria were found much less abundant in the agitated digester, which was ma...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Journal of Environmental Conservation Engineering
سال: 1987
ISSN: 1882-8590,0388-9459
DOI: 10.5956/jriet.16.173